“DO NOT buy accounts with @fundedbits. I worked hard to make $500 on my funded account and they denied my payout by lying and making false accusations (proof in the thread).”
– @BlazeMMXM

With this post, trader @BlazeMMXM kicked off a firestorm on X, accusing prop firm FundedBits of denying him a payout. The tweet quickly gained traction and triggered a chain reaction from other traders and former collaborators who claimed similar experiences.

“They also denied me (I didn’t trade with them) I worked for them. Nothing!!
They deny workers and deny traders.” – @TheIrisGray

Well-known accounts like Dr Liquidity, Sir Hisham, and Ary MMXM joined the conversation, demanding transparency.

“Everyone get in, we want proof of reality,” wrote @DRLIQUIDITYX.

‍

FundedBits Responds

FundedBits issued an official statement on X, strongly denying the accusations:

“Recently @BlazeMMXM made a false allegation regarding our payout practices.
We categorically deny these claims and present verified proof to support the truth.”

The firm reiterated that fairness, transparency, and trader empowerment have always been part of its mission. However, the comments suggest the community remains skeptical, as screenshots and criticism continue to flood the thread.

Community Reactions

While it started as a single complaint, the situation has now become a wider conversation about trust, transparency, and red flags in the prop industry. Multiple traders are chiming in with stories and warnings, turning this thread into a spotlight moment for accountability.

PropInsider’s Take

As the prop industry expands, reputation risk is becoming more serious than ever. Traders demand clarity—and public disputes like this one show that prop firms need more than good marketing.
They need proof, not promises.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in the embedded posts are those of the individual users and do not reflect those of PropInsider. Some content may include strong language. Included for informational purposes only.

‍